Discourse Pragmatics vs. Prescriptive Stylistics
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Discourse dynamics, pragmatics, and indefinites
Everyone agrees that conversations take place in a context. This is not to merely point out that conversations occur at a time and a place, or that there are particular speakers and hearers, though this is all of course true. Conversations take place against a background of mutually recognized facts: facts about the beliefs and presumptions of the participants, facts about the information conve...
متن کاملPragmatics and Discourse in Knowledge Graphs
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are fast becoming the cornerstone of research for storing and retrieving information effectively due to their ability to link heterogeneous data, make inferences, and discover new knowledge without additional human input. Researchers use a plethora of KGs like NELL, DBPedia, YAGO to augment their information extraction activities. However, in such diverse and expressive g...
متن کاملMorphosyntax is Easy , Discourse / Pragmatics is Hard
Turkish is a highly inflected, agglutinative language in which subject NPs are never overtly casemarked, but object NPs often are. Although all six possible word orders are grammatical when objects are overtly casemarked, only SOV and OVS word orders are grammatical when objects lack overt casemarking. In imitation experiments, Batman-Ratyosyan and Stromswold (1999) found that 4and 5-year-old T...
متن کاملModelling the Interpretation of Discourse Connectives by Bayesian Pragmatics
We propose a framework to model human comprehension of discourse connectives. Following the Bayesian pragmatic paradigm, we advocate that discourse connectives are interpreted based on a simulation of the production process by the speaker, who, in turn, considers the ease of interpretation for the listener when choosing connectives. Evaluation against the sense annotation of the Penn Discourse ...
متن کاملInvited Talk: On the Foundations of a Formal Discourse Pragmatics
Could we enrich speech-act theory to deal with discourse ? Wittgenstein and Searle pointed out difficulties. Most conversations lack a conversational purpose , their background is indefinitely open , they can contain irrelevant and infelicitous utterances , they require collective intentionality , etc.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
سال: 2001
ISSN: 2377-1666,0363-2946
DOI: 10.3765/bls.v27i1.1095